Who is individual contributor

What results will make you a great contributor? What is a positive contributor? How can you contribute to our company if you are hired?

What are your expectations from the company? What are your salary expectations best answers? What you expect from this job? Previous Article How did the Allies won the war? Next Article How can I help an injured owl? Back To Top. If you want to get hired as an individual contributor, it's important to develop useful skills in the workplace.

In this article, we explore what those skills may be and how to succeed in an interview for an individual contributor. As the name implies, an individual contributor is a professional without management responsibilities who contributes to an organization independently to help support its goals and mission.

Although they usually have to report to someone within the organization, an individual contributor is not responsible for managing anyone except for themselves. They may be the manager of a process or project that they can complete as part of a team or individually, but are not responsible for managing a team of people. Both individual contributors and managers have managing responsibilities, but individual contributors perform more self-management.

Managers are in charge of a group of people, which may include individual contributors, and the projects and processes they are working on. Individual contributors manage more tactile tasks, such as sorting online files. In contrast, a manager takes on the more strategic tasks of developing project teams and focusing on growth goals. Because individual contributors are not responsible for a group of people as managers are, they have more time to dedicate to honing their craft and becoming experts in their work.

Managers often have to attend meetings that an individual contributor doesn't, such as budgetary and employee relations meetings. Managers may also delegate responsibilities to individual contributors whose job it is to make sure they complete the task. Read more: How to Become a Manager. When considering the path of an individual contributor, you will want to develop these skills to succeed in the workplace:. As an individual contributor, you are responsible for your own tasks and projects, but you will still want to maintain open communication with coworkers, managers and members of other departments.

It's important to be an active part of the workplace because you may need to share information with others, and you'll want a healthy working relationship so any meetings can run smoothly. For example, if you are working on improving the technology behind the loan application at your bank, you may need to communicate with the loan officers on how the customers should navigate through the new process.

Not just technical teams, but management teams. Let's change how we refer to people. It identifies those who have no other employees reporting to them—nothing more. It has nothing to do with their contributions, team membership, or relative worth to the organization or to society. It is simply an attribute of the Employee or Job object that has proven useful in human capital management systems.

In context, it is useful and meaningful. Out of context, maybe not as much. Final thought: humans are only one type of resource to be managed. Some managers oversee financial resources, capital equipment resources, inventory, intellectual property resources, licenses and other usage arrangements, and other assets and expenses. Some may end up managing multiple types of resources and may interact with everyone from their own team to the general public or governmental agencies.

However, it makes no sense in an agile organization. We change titles and names all the time to fit the context. With the realization that people work in teams, it might be time to change the words.

The idea of aborting a process is a very old idea in software. The non-people managers are responsible for shepherding the process by which they achieve results. If I want to help organizations move to an agile culture and I do , I need to help the HR people realize that individual-based compensation when we focus on teamwork is crazy-making for the people and for the teams.

When the reward system is out of sync with the actions we want people to talk, it makes sense to change the reward system. In the same way, it makes sense to me to change the names of how we refer to people. I think you and I might disagree with how much people need management. We might violently agree! In my experience, managing other resources is very different from managing people. I should do a post on that.

Johanna, I would note that managing, supervising, and leading are very different activities and one size only fits one; often, even that fit is temporary.

Semper Gumby—always flexible. Also note while it is preferable to reward teams as groups, few people are willing to accept that failure should also impact their compensation. Skip to navigation Skip to content. Discover Membership. Editions Quartz.

More from Quartz About Quartz. Follow Quartz. These are some of our most ambitious editorial projects.